<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 20 Players Since The Millennium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stoke.footballblog.co.uk/top-20-players-since-the-millennium.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stoke.footballblog.co.uk/top-20-players-since-the-millennium.html</link>
	<description>part of the BlogsFC team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:25:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: I*T*P*L</title>
		<link>http://stoke.footballblog.co.uk/top-20-players-since-the-millennium.html/comment-page-1#comment-3486</link>
		<dc:creator>I*T*P*L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoke.footballblog.co.uk/?p=1351#comment-3486</guid>
		<description>Good to see you got this article finished Mozzaa. I agree with pretty much all the players, but not the order. For me Hansson should be a lot higher, while Gallagher should be a lot lower, and I know that it&#039;s hard to do otherwise when we&#039;re currently going through our best period for a long time, but it seems a little heavily weighted towards current players for me.

On the whole an enjoyable piece though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see you got this article finished Mozzaa. I agree with pretty much all the players, but not the order. For me Hansson should be a lot higher, while Gallagher should be a lot lower, and I know that it&#8217;s hard to do otherwise when we&#8217;re currently going through our best period for a long time, but it seems a little heavily weighted towards current players for me.</p>
<p>On the whole an enjoyable piece though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
